opencaching.com Forum Index opencaching.com
Geocaching by the community, for the community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What needs to be in the META tags?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    opencaching.com Forum Index -> Code Monkeys
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CoyoteRed



Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 220

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:55 am    Post subject: What needs to be in the META tags? Reply with quote

I'm ready to move forward with my site, but I want to include the META info to be included in the opensource.

Namespace? GEOCACHE.whatever? Or should we use and expand on the GEO tag?

Things to be included:

  • Cache name
  • Cache ID
  • Cache waypoint
  • Location/coords
  • Location/state, country #for ease of searching via Google
  • Owner
  • Owner base URL #Home page URL from which all of there caches can be found
  • Cache type #Expanded list to be discussed seperately
  • Cache size #ditto
  • Difficulty
  • Terrain
  • Date placed


Those are the basics.

Optionally, we could have:

  • Date last confirmed/checked/logged
  • URL of GPX file this cache is included in # needed until the tools are in place.
  • Last edited
  • Short discription
  • Long discription
  • Hints


The last three could make the cache discription complete (if I haven't left anything out) and could be crawled by a spider to create a GPX file. Also, the list could be used by a program like Spinner to draw the freshest content directly from the cache page. Plus, with the discriptions in the META, the rest of the page is free to do whatever you please.

Can you tell I like Spinner? The reason I keep bringing up Spinner is because it can give the nearest caches from a cache and lists of nearest cache from a point via reflocations. You then upload to PDA and off you go. With this scheme, you don't have to wait on your PQ, just have it run in the morning and it'll be waiting for you.

I'd like to see a working scheme decided on ASAP.

CR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
CoyoteRed



Joined: 18 Sep 2003
Posts: 220

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You what, forget "Short Discription" and "Long Discription." Call it "Blurb" and "Discription."

Short and Long is probably not being used at GC.com as it was first intended. Short Discription was probably conceptually meant to be included in the cache list much like the listings on Google has a short discription.

By going with Blurb instead it would lessen confusion. Letting people know that the Blurb will be included in any search results, they 'll know what they need to put in there. i.e. not title graphics and such for what it's used for now.

Though GC.com has long ago reached a point that it would hard the make people conform to that standard, they could. It would mean listing anything outside any HTML tags in the short discription and putting within search result.

I really like the idea of short discriptions in the result list because it will tell me more about the cache without me actually having to go to the cache page. If I'm on a slow connection or the server where the cache page is hosted is slow, it'd be a real help.

I'd much rather see, "Nice hike in a local county park along a river" than nothing at all.

CR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
hmarq
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's be realistic here --

I don't think we're going to get a final standard metadata format hashed out this morning so you can code this afternoon and weekend Smile I'd really like to see some input from the group/world ...

That said, what you suggest is a fine start, I was thinking a bit less, but if there is extra stuff in the metadata, it can be ignored, stored or both.

First I think there should be an identifiable namespace designation for geocaching stuff -- I think the geourl are using META="geo.attribute" varying 'attribute' as needed. I actually like that ... geo is only 3 characters, which is bandwidth friendly (it could be 2, but the logical gc usage folks would complain about).

attributes would obviously need to be lat, long, url to be completely minimalist, but as I'd really like enough info to search on with the listing server. So I'd add, terrain rating, difficulty, title, short description, country and state. Original waypoint if you want it, but in the case of these offsite ones, url serves the same purpose.

If you want to use the other items in your list, that's fine, the beauty is that spiders that don't recognized the extended format can ignore the other attributes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hmarq
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yeah, I thought of a couple

Date changed: so that spiders can do a quick date compare and blow past pages that haven't been updated.

status: so that archived pages can still exist but be screened out of searches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    opencaching.com Forum Index -> Code Monkeys All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group