opencaching.com Forum Index opencaching.com
Geocaching by the community, for the community
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Landowner Liaison

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    opencaching.com Forum Index -> Let's Get Organized
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Renegade Knight



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 151

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 12:09 am    Post subject: Landowner Liaison Reply with quote

We need people willing to be part of a small team to talk to landowners and come up with a working list of their needs and concerns. This will be used to help set the direction of opencaching. One of our goals is to develop credibility with the landowners so that they will see opencaching as a resource and partner when it comes to geocaching.

If you are interested please contact me directly, especially if you are a land manager/geocacher. I’ll be away from email for a few days so I may not be able to respond until later in the week.

If you don't want to be part of the team but have worked with landowners then post your experienc on their concerns in this thread. Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
amnesius



Joined: 27 Sep 2003
Posts: 147
Location: ./earth/europe/*

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we should think about some ways to contact opencaching when a problem comes up with a particular cache. as far as i know theres no specific landowner contact at gc.com
_________________
~Amnesius
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Scout



Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 235

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

amnesius wrote:
I think we should think about some ways to contact opencaching when a problem comes up with a particular cache.


Why not by having finders suggest their own values for all the attributes a cache that the hider supplied when he listed the cache (e.g., difficulty, terrain, etc., and also, dangerous, possibly illegal, plundered, contraband, etc.)?

Someone can write a program to monitor the logs for any new reports of things that should be looked into. Volunteers will investigate.
_________________
Scout http://GPSgames.org

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
welch



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scout wrote:
amnesius wrote:
I think we should think about some ways to contact opencaching when a problem comes up with a particular cache.


Why not by having finders suggest their own values for all the attributes a cache that the hider supplied when he listed the cache (e.g., difficulty, terrain, etc., and also, dangerous, possibly illegal, plundered, contraband, etc.)?

Someone can write a program to monitor the logs for any new reports of things that should be looked into. Volunteers will investigate.


Uh Question what will the volunteers investigate?
(physically visit the cache or like review posted logs to suggest it be archived/disabled?)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scout



Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 235

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

welch wrote:
Uh :?: what will the volunteers investigate?
(physically visit the cache or like review posted logs to suggest it be archived/disabled?)


When a person hides a cache, he gives it a terrain rating, a difficulty rating, he might indicate whether it's family-friendly, or on public land, or whatever.

Everyone who hunts that cache can provide his own interpretation to those attributes. Everyone. We're all *investigators.* It happens in the normal course of playing this game.

When you review a list of caches, you can see what everyone else thought of it. Maybe you'll filter out those caches where a majority of hunters said it wasn't family-friendly. Or maybe you don't want to take any chances and will filter out those caches where any single person said he thought it wasn't family-friendly. It's up to you, not some approver in who-knows-where making your decisions for you.
_________________
Scout http://GPSgames.org

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Renegade Knight



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 151

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We still need people to help with this effort. Anyone interested please email me. Thanks.

For those wondering, here is why the landmanger issue is important.

http://www.nwi.org/Maps/GovLands.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
welch



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2003 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Renegade Knight wrote:
We still need people to help with this effort. Anyone interested please email me. Thanks.

For those wondering, here is why the landmanger issue is important.

http://www.nwi.org/Maps/GovLands.html

Interesting map, is there any way to zoom in? Im trying to figure out what some of the smaller specks are... Confused
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hmarq
Site Admin


Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2003 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Renegade Knight wrote:
We still need people to help with this effort. Anyone interested please email me. Thanks.

For those wondering, here is why the landmanger issue is important.

http://www.nwi.org/Maps/GovLands.html


Hmm, that is an interesting map ... I can certainly see why it's an issue in the western US ... just the same as I can see why no one in the Midwest really seems to care ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
welch



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmarq wrote:
Renegade Knight wrote:
We still need people to help with this effort. Anyone interested please email me. Thanks.

For those wondering, here is why the landmanger issue is important.

http://www.nwi.org/Maps/GovLands.html


Hmm, that is an interesting map ... I can certainly see why it's an issue in the western US ... just the same as I can see why no one in the Midwest really seems to care ...


Hey now Mad ,
I care... just not as much.... Sad
AFAIK in Iowa there are no National Forests or Parks. But there is one Monument (Effigy Mounds), and I think Desoto Lake was a National something(Refudge?).
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
welch



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

welch wrote:
hmarq wrote:
Renegade Knight wrote:
We still need people to help with this effort. Anyone interested please email me. Thanks.

For those wondering, here is why the landmanger issue is important.

http://www.nwi.org/Maps/GovLands.html


Hmm, that is an interesting map ... I can certainly see why it's an issue in the western US ... just the same as I can see why no one in the Midwest really seems to care ...


Hey now Mad ,
I care... just not as much.... Sad
AFAIK in Iowa there are no National Forests or Parks. But there is one Monument (Effigy Mounds), and I think Desoto Lake was a National something(Refudge?).

Just want to clearify, when I say "I don't care much", Im referring to Federal land. There is a realatively small amount in my area, so the exact rules of those areas don't directly affect me. The larger issue is itself very important, and I do care.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Renegade Knight



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 151

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know of a way to zoom in. The map is mostly Federal Lands. Cities and county parks would outnumber completely the quantity federal land locations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nici-



Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 199
Location: Hürth near Cologne, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi!

Renegade Knight wrote:
I don't know of a way to zoom in. The map is mostly Federal Lands. Cities and county parks would outnumber completely the quantity federal land locations.


I googled a bit to find something similar for Germany but to no avail ;-( Anyway, I found a chart that shows the situation for Europe. It reads as follows:
- It shows the ownership of the woods only
- blue: governmental, red: privat, green: property of public corporations or other

So the situation in Europe differs from state to state. In fact in Germany more than a third of the woods is in private hands. Actually I've never ever felt like on privat land on any of my tours. So I guess, landowners don't care if people use their property for recreational purpose as long as they woods aren't disturbed in a way, that endangers them. I really don't _know_, I've never had contact with an owner of woods!

nici-
_________________

Geocaching.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Renegade Knight



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 151

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting chart. To tell you the truth I actually expected less government land in Western Europe. Thanks, that helps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    opencaching.com Forum Index -> Let's Get Organized All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group